The 2026 Data World Cup is a Sports Data Campus project that analyses the 2026 FIFA World Cup using advanced statistics, performance metrics and technical-tactical analysis. Its studies explain what really happened in each match beyond the final score, using data on expected goals, possession, shots, pressing, passing and defensive actions.
This article brings together 20 must-read stories from the 2026 World Cup, built from those analyses. It also highlights the tournament’s five standout stats, featuring the most remarkable records for attacking output, shot volume, ball circulation and defensive performance.
The 2026 Data World Cup
The 2026 FIFA World Cup produced hundreds of statistics that help explain team performances from a far more objective perspective. Beyond goals and the final standings, metrics such as expected goals xG, shot quality, pressing, progressive carries and defensive actions reveal how each victory was really built and which factors made the difference in the tournament’s decisive moments.
The 2026 Data World Cup was created with precisely that goal: to turn the vast amount of information generated throughout the tournament into clear, practical and easy-to-understand analysis. Every statistic is placed in the context of the match to explain why one team dominated with less possession, how a goalkeeper changed the outcome, or how a side progressed despite creating fewer chances than its opponent.
Below, you’ll find 20 stories that explain the World Cup through data, together with the five standout records from the 2026 tournament. They are not simply interesting statistics, but examples of how data analysis provides a deeper understanding of football and reveals details that often go unnoticed when only the final score is considered.
Explore the stories and stats that explain the 2026 World Cup beyond the goals and the final score
The top five stats from the 2026 World Cup
Biggest defensive gap in a decisive knockout match
Spain won 56 defensive actions compared with France’s 31.
Spain won 56 defensive actions compared with France’s 31.
The 25-action gap shows that the semi-final was not won through possession or attacking quality alone, but also through anticipation and pressing high up the pitch.
Highest number of completed passes
Morocco completed 813 passes against the Netherlands.
Morocco completed 813 passes against the Netherlands.
They had 61.4% possession and used the ball to control the tempo, wear down their opponents and limit their attacks before going through in the penalty shootout.
Lowest attacking output recorded
Tunisia finished with just 0.02 xG against Japan.
Tunisia finished with just 0.02 xG against Japan.
They managed only two shots, with neither hitting the target. Japan won 4–0.
Most shots in a single match
Belgium had 35 shots against New Zealand.
Belgium had 35 shots against New Zealand.
Belgium produced 3.99 xG, registered ten shots on target and won 5–1.
Highest xG recorded in an analysed match
Canada generated 4.18 xG against Qatar.
Canada generated 4.18 xG against Qatar.
It was the highest figure among the matches included in the document, just above the 4.17 xG produced by Germany against Curaçao.